Using Feminism to Understand White Male Privilege

About a week ago I stumbled on this tumblr page, white guys doing it by themselves. I thought it was the perfect satirical commentary on the patriarchal “white male” culture we live in.  As I found out after posting a link to the site on Facebook, some of my fellow law students (specifically, white males) did not think so.  They all agreed that our culture should be about promoting diversity, but they didn’t agree with how “anti-white male” everything has become.

It seems as if whenever women or other minority groups make strides, it is at the cost of the “white male” majority.  The baselessness of this argument is perfectly demonstrated in the article, “How Feminism Hurts Men” by Micah J. Murray.

What bothered me most about my fellow students commentary was that they didn’t understand my point: it is not about being a white male, it is the ideology of white male privilege. As Zillah Eisenstein states, “The phallocratic standard in Western industrial societies is white, middle-class male.” Historically, this is fact – whites have always been in more power-filled positions, and this includes white females, like myself.

I think the first step to moving forward is admitting this to ourselves – colorblindness and genderblindness are not the answer. In order to successfully move away from white privilege and towards a society where we can learn to appreciate each other’s differences, we have to accept that the structural inequalities in place position white males at the helm.  As Peggy McIntosh states, “To redesign social systems we need first to acknowledge their colossal unseen dimensions.”

This is not to say that I, or feminism, are “anti-(white) male;” many people have the perception that feminism is about man-hating. Why does it have to be one or the other? Why must we sacrifice the rights of one group in order to elevate the other? Feminism is about human rights, not necessarily women’s rights – we are all a combination of different races, sex/gender, religion, economic status, and more. Feminism is about learning to appreciate those differences in ourselves and in others.

I told all of this to my fellow students, and I hope we (as whites) can become aware of our privilege and learn to use it to change the system of inequality we currently live in.

 

Sunday Funday: SNL’s Gettysburg Address Review

Sunday Funday: SNL’s Gettysburg Address Review

Last night,Saturday Night Live‘s Seth Meyers interviewed Jebidiah Atkinson on “Weekend Update.” Atkinson was on SNL to explain his negative review of Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.  Atkinson’s appearance corresponds with the decision of The Patriot News, a Pennsylvania newspaper which retracted the review this week after publishing it 150 years ago.

 

For more public policy related video/audio, be sure to check out the SLACE Archive.

 

Sunday Funday: SNL’s Gettysburg Address Review

Sunday Funday: SNL’s Gettysburg Address Review

Last night,Saturday Night Live‘s Seth Meyers interviewed Jebidiah Atkinson on “Weekend Update.” Atkinson was on SNL to explain his negative review of Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.  Atkinson’s appearance corresponds with the decision of The Patriot News, a Pennsylvania newspaper which retracted the review this week after publishing it 150 years ago. 

Ivory Tower: Is Obama Reboot Necessary? Possible?

Ivory Tower: Is Obama Reboot Necessary? Possible?

That was main question being discussed on yesterday WCNY’s The Ivory Tower.

Hosted by David Rubin (Dean of the Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University, this edition of The Ivory Tower featured a powerhouse panel including: Lisa Dolak (Syracuse University College of Law), Tim Byrnes (Colgate Univesity), Bob Greene (Cazenovia College), Tara Ross (Onondaga County Community College), and Kristi Andersen (Maxwell School of Syracuse University).

The panel also discussed the fiftieth anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy. 

Here is a description of the program:

Should President Obama hit the re-set button and focus on 3 main issues? First, getting his judicial nominees approved, then leveling with the public about the extent of NSA spying and finally fixing the complicated healthcare overhaul. Then a look at the 50th anniversary of the assassination of JFK, and how history books are not treating the former President too kindly.

Janet Yellen before the Senate Banking Committee

If you happen to follow the Federal Reserve, then you are aware that Ben Bernanke’s tenure at chair of the Fed will be up soon. President Obama has nominated Janet Yellen to the post, making her the first woman nominee. There doesn’t appear to be too much push back from the Senate, and in all likelihood she will be confirmed as the first woman chair of the Fed. You can read a good description of the hearing, including Yellen’s articulation to her intention to continue QE3 into the future, here.

It’s worth noting that, despite the obscurity of the position, the chair of the Federal Reserve is probably the most influential person in the U.S. economy, in many ways much more influential than the President or Congress. In that regard, I think you could classify this breaking of a glass ceiling on par with Nancy Pelosi becoming the first woman Speaker of the House.

What do you, dear readers, think of Yellen as a pick? A victory for modern feminism? Smart/ disastrous continuation of the Bernanke policies? Sound off in the comments.