Biomass Energy is More Than Corn Ethanol

I’ve touched on my thoughts about biofuels in previous posts. Essentially, I feel that (and a lot of science has shown that) corn ethanol is a waste of effort and energy, resulting in soil degradation and harm to farmers who have to deal with fluctuating corn prices. On the other hand, cellulosic ethanol has potential, but has yet to make it to commercial scale at any real volume.

 
Biofuels are a major topic in the energy conversation and fairly well covered by the media and in policy. But biomass energy is more than just biofuels. Biomass as a whole represents half of all renewable energy, according to the latest EIA data. According to this EIA data, wood biomass represents 2.007 quads (quadrillion British thermal units), compared to just 1.297 quads from liquid biofuels. There is also a category of “other biomass” representing 0.480 quads, which includes municipal solid waste from biological sources, as well as landfill gases and any other non-wood biomass.

 
It’s important to remember that wood biomass represents such a large portion of our renewable energy mix. Wood can be an affordable, sustainable source of energy for home heating in many rural areas. Additionally, modern outdoor wood boilers are more efficient and have lower emissions than the wood stoves of the past. Wood is typically considered a “traditional” fuel, rather than a modern energy source or an energy source of the future. But pellet stoves and other end-use technologies have made it progressively more important as a source of modern renewable energy.

 
Additionally, the production of energy crops has been increasing as farmers put some of their marginal land into the production of woody plants or perennial grasses. In upstate New York, this is typically shrub willow, a fast-growing woody crop related to the willow trees many people are familiar with. I am part of the shrub willow research group at the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. We focus on the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of willow production systems. The Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP) through the USDA was recently implemented to provide funding to farmers who establish energy crops on their land and to help with connecting farmers with end-users of the biomass. Energy crops tend to run into a chicken-and-egg scenario. It is difficult to convince people to grow the crop without a solid long-term market for the biomass, but it is also difficult to establish the market without a solid long-term supply of biomass. The BCAP help to alleviate this issue by setting up contracts between growers and end-users. The BCAP is likely to continue under the new Farm Bill, allowing more farmers to plant their marginal land with shrub willow or other energy crops, such as hybrid poplar, sorghum, or switchgrass.

 
Energy crops can be used in cellulosic ethanol systems when these systems become commercial scale, but can also be used directly for heating and electricity production. Some coal plants have found that co-firing biomass (usually wood) with coal, with only minor retrofitting of the plant, can be an economical way to reduce emissions in the face of stricter regulations. There are also several biomass-to-electricity plants, including some in upstate New York that run primarily on wood residues from logging operations and other waste wood. Wood and grasses can also be pelletized and burned for home heating. The new Gateway Center at SUNY ESF contains a wood pellet boiler that provides heat and hot water to campus for 3 seasons of the year.
In a future post, I can speak more specifically to the environmental benefits of growing energy crops over traditional row crops on marginal land. But for now, when you think of renewable energy, don’t just think of solar panels and wind farms!

 

For more information on the potential of wood biomass in the Northeast.
For more information on the SUNY ESF willow biomass research group.

Uber-Efficient or Uber-Obnoxious: How Much Would You Pay for a Cab?

Uber-Efficient or Uber-Obnoxious: How Much Would You Pay for a Cab?

This week, the Planet Money podcast discussed the Uber app and surge pricing.  The Uber app permits pedestrian in need of a cab during rush hour to attain one, albeit for an increased price.  

Here is a description of the podcast: 

Here’s the scenario: A man and his wife are desperate to get to the hospital because she is about to deliver a baby. It’s a hot summer day. It’s rush hour. They flag down a private car and ask, “How much?” To their surprise the driver wants to charge them four times the normal price of a cab.

So, is this a story about a cabbie taking advantage of a vulnerable couple or is it simply good economics?

Today, we are talking about a company that charges people in desperate situations more for a ride, and we’ll consider the argument that it might actually be better for everyone.

Uber-Efficient or Uber-Obnoxious: How Much Would You Pay for a Cab?

Uber-Efficient or Uber-Obnoxious: How Much Would You Pay for a Cab?

This week, the Planet Money podcast discussed the Uber app and surge pricing.  The Uber app permits pedestrian in need of a cab during rush hour to attain one, albeit for an increased price.  

Here is a description of the podcast: 

Here’s the scenario: A man and his wife are desperate to get to the hospital because she is about to deliver a baby. It’s a hot summer day. It’s rush hour. They flag down a private car and ask, “How much?” To their surprise the driver wants to charge them four times the normal price of a cab.

So, is this a story about a cabbie taking advantage of a vulnerable couple or is it simply good economics?

Today, we are talking about a company that charges people in desperate situations more for a ride, and we’ll consider the argument that it might actually be better for everyone.

Saving Money by Providing Free Homes for Homeless?

Saving Money by Providing Free Homes for Homeless?

This past Sunday, 60 Minutes ran an interesting story about municipalities that are providing free homes to the homeless in order to save money.  

Reported by Anderson Cooper here is how the story began: 

Giving apartments to homeless people who’ve been on the streets for years before they’ve received treatment for drug or alcohol problems or mental illness may not sound like a wise idea. But that’s what’s being done in cities across America in an approach that targets those who’ve been homeless the longest and are believed to be at greatest risk of dying, especially with all of this cold weather.

They’re people who once might have been viewed as unreachable.  But cities and counties affiliated with a movement known as the 100,000 Homes Campaign have so far managed to get 80,000 of them off the streets. Local governments and non-profit groups do most of the work. The money comes mostly from existing federal programs and private donations, and there’s evidence that this approach saves taxpayers money. 

 

Potential Complications with the Sochi Olympics

With the Sochi Winter Olympics officially upon us, the world’s attention will likely be fixed on Sochi, Russia, a small resort town built almost solely to house the new Olympic venue. There have been plenty of discussions in popular media outlets about the living conditions for athletes and spectators in Sochi as well as the alleged corruption which has made the Sochi Olympics the most expensive in history. One topic, however, has received a somewhat lower profile.

There has been a lot of media expressing concern about Russia’s official stance regarding LGBT athletes and spectators, but most discussions of potential terror threats are focused on domestic Russia. However, the House Homeland Security Committee is advising airlines that fly nonstop to Russia that “explosive materials could be concealed in toothpaste or cosmetic tubes.”

Because of the expected concentration of people in Sochi as spectators go to watch the Olympics, homeland security officials are worried that any explosives might be used either in the air or detonated once the traveler reaches Sochi. However, “authorities have increasing confidence about the safety of Sochi and the Olympic venues. Still, U.S. intelligence is picking up increasing chatter that causes worry about targets outside the Sochi area, including regional transportation links.”
The parties which are of major concern include domestic Russian terrorists from the southern regions of the county, as well as potential al Qaeda cells. Representative Peter King, from New York said that “he believes the athletes and American spectators are ‘reasonably safe,’ but noted that he would not go himself.
‘Just as a spectator, I don’t think it’s worth the risk. I mean, odds are nothing is going to happen, but the odds are higher than for any other Olympics, I believe, that something could happen’”.
Would you go to the Olympics this year? What responsibility does the Russian government have to keep the international contingent safe?